Why Google+ Might Succeed
Two good points about Google+, both from politcal bloggers oddly enough. First, Ezra Klein:
It’s not that any of its features are so revolutionary. It’s not that it’s better at doing social networking than Facebook. It’s that it’s an opportunity to start over, to build your social network with years of Facebook experience in mind, rather than having to face the accretion of mistakes and miscalculations you made over almost a decade of trial-and-error with a new technology.
This is exactly right. We all learned the hard way that sharing via Facebook tended to expose things we didn't want to. Google+ gives us the opportunity to correct that. Plus (haha), it has better integrated privacy controls to keep things private.
Next up is Matthew Yglesias:
I think the underlying issue here was actually laid out extremely well in The Social Network and then ignored in the ensuing discussion of the film. But the movie has Mark Zuckerberg repeatedly emphasize that what makes Facebook an appealing product is that it’s “cool” and “exclusive” and they shouldn’t ruin it by making it uncool.
He's right. We're destined to constantly move to new and different social networks. We'll do it for the same reason we move to new and different places in real life: the old ones are no longer cool.


